git merge without auto commit
Is it possible to do a "git merge", but without a commit?
"man git merge" says this:
With --no-commit perform the merge but pretend the merge failed and do not autocommit,
to give the user a chance to inspect and further tweak the merge result before
But when I try to use git merge with the --no-commit it still auto-commits. Here's what I did:
$> ~/git/testrepo$ git checkout master
Switched to branch 'master'
$> ~/git/testrepo$ git branch
$> ~/git/testrepo$ git merge --no-commit v1.0
file1 | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
$> ~/git/testrepo$ git status
# On branch master
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit.
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
A subsequent "git log" reveals all the commits from the v1.0 branch merged into master.
I would like to avoid git auto merging my composer.json. This way I can have a composer.json in develop branch that uses dev-develop packages, while the one in master only uses dev-master packages. I
In my local repo I have one commit with an incorrect commit message. I've already published the incorrect commit message with git push. Now the remote repo (which is GitHub-hosted) has the incorrect c
Whenever I try to push in Git I get this: You have not concluded your merge (MERGE_HEAD exists). Please, commit your changes before you can merge. Running git status I get: # On branch master nothing
Just when I thought I'd got the hang of the git checkout -b newbranch - commit/commit/commit - git checkout master - git merge newbranch - git rebase -i master - git push workflow in git, something bl
When git tfs could not create a merge commit, it says warning: this changeset 7504 is a merge changeset. But it can't have been managed accordingly because one of the parent changeset 7494 is not pres
right now i have several projects tracked with git. Now, i want to make one big project, with several subfolders for each of the previous projects and preserve their history along with the history of
I have a project where I made changes, and want to send them to another user, using git send-email feature. I found that it works by sending patches (created by git format-patch of each commit). Is it
As the title says, I am not really clear about the differences between a git merge --squash and a git merge --no-commit. As far as I understand the help page for git merge, both commands would leave m
I'm a complete newbie to Git, not really sure what's going on. My buddy and I are working on a project together. I fetched all the files from a remote server git fetch, so I now have a whole bunch of
I'm still pretty new to Git, but I noticed today that a few of my commits are showing up as duplicates with identical SHA-1 and commit messages. What's going on here? $ git log --pretty=oneline 739ca7
Is it possible to have git commit also add new files and directories? It seems a lot of needless typing in the long run to have to type git add . then git commit (That, and I have a tendency to ofte
I'm pretty new to git so I'm still getting my bearings with the tool. I have a small problem involving a merge. Basically the timeline is as follows: Did a rebase from SVN using git-svn bridge Had
Company policy is to use --no-ff for merge commits. I personally like to adjust merge log messages so I use --no-commit. Plus I like to actually compile and test before I let the commit go. How do I m
For a while, I worked in with Git in this unusual way: git checkout -b feature123 tiny edit, commit, repeat git checkout master git merge --squash feature123 Use output of git log --oneline to popula
Could anyone please tell me what the difference between these two commands: git merge --squash and git merge --no-ff
For example, when I merge from master -> production, I'd like to see a list of the commits before I, err, commit to them. Something like: $ git merge --doublecheck master Commits to merge: 1292642
I just did an svn merge to merge changes from the trunk to a branch: $ svn merge -r328:HEAD file:///home/user/svn/repos/proj/trunk . --- Merging r388 through r500 into '.': A foo A bar C baz1 C baz2 U
So far I was developing without versioning software and my application contains many files (functionality, configuration files and auto-generated files). Now another two people will be working on this
How to run git commit -m '...' command from another directory? I edit my file: vim /home/.../myFile I add it using: git add /home/.../myFile But now, how can I commit the changes? git commit -m '...
Folks, I am a little new to stashing in git so may be I missing something basic here, this is what I am doing: I am on my master branch and I have been working on a file app/models/medicine.rb , I wa
This question already has an answer here: How do you revert a faulty git merge commit 2 answers I've stumbled upon this problem with my repo: I have the following structure of my branch tree:
I m working on an open source project using git. I made some modification on the source code ( modify existing file, add new files, remove existing files) and I want to generate a patch file without m
I have a ton of new files to commit. Clicking each one in git gui (Windows) to stage is annoying. How can I can I commit a whole bunch of files at once?
I can't make correct branch merge in git. For example, I have two branches: C - D - E my_branch / A - B - F - G - K *master Now I am on master. After git merge my_branch I got at master some like
I have a branch which I've merged into master. On the branch, git log file shows a commit on February 9 On master, git log file does not show the commit on February 9th On master, git log does show th
How do I edit or reword a merge commit's message? git commit --amend works if it's the last commit made (HEAD), but what if it comes before HEAD? git rebase -i HEAD~5 doesn't list the merge commits.
What is the recommended format to be used in git's commit messages (COMMIT_EDITMSG), if there is any?
I'm trying to commit the following directory structure to git: web /uploads /avatars /video I put .gitkeep into /web/uploads/avatars/ and /web/uploads/video/ and added the following lines to .gitigno
git version 18.104.22.168 commit 142e37219a68955ded79fbd9faa83cb4585b02ca Merge: 6e9b88f 1b141fd Author: Steve Date: Wed Oct 31 10:56:51 2012 +0700 Merge branch 'dev-video' into 'dev-video_res-management' c
I am trying to learn branching and merging in git. I thought that merging 2 branches automatically generates a merge commit and message (which I regard as a good thing). I DO want a commit and a commi
While trying to pull from a remote branch I get an error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by merge: app/..../_shared.scss Git is asking to commit the file or to stash. T
I can make a commit with git with the following command: git commit -a However then I have to enter the comment with VIM. Id rather do it all with one command so ive tried the following: git commit -
There is a small topic branch (on a contributor's remote repo) that I'd like to apply on top of my master. I think the canonical way to do this is: git merge contributor/topic-branch But I'd like to
I'd like to use git to record all the changes to a file. Is there a way I can turn git 'commit' on to automatically happen every time a file is updated - so there is a new commit for every change to
Is there an option like --author of git-commit for git-merge? We maintain a staging environment where some changes must be performed. Some limitations make us to use only one linux user to access stag
Say I have two branches master -- A - - - - - - merge \ / \- develop -- B -- C Now if I want to merge it will be a fast forward, but should I do git checkout develop git merge master or git checkou
I have a developer who keeps committing, and every time he does - it does a git merge branch onto branch commit; every time. Even with his own code. Ie, my history looks like this almost all the time
It is possible to assign existing commit to issue without using auto commit + issue integration (e.g. fixes #XXX, closed #XXX, etc. in commit title)?
Say I have a feature branch, into which I merge upstream changes prior to pushing my changes back: git branch feature1 ... [edit my code] ... [commit] git fetch origin master git merge fetch_head [or
I have a develop branch and a feature branch in my git repo. I added a commit to develop and now I want that commit to be merged to my feature branch. If I do this git checkout feature git merge devel
I would like to do a git merge to plough the work of one branch back into another. However, since a lot has been done and I'm going to do a no-fast-forward merge I would like the commit to contain ex
Basically I have read the git merge conflicts guide, and I'm not sure it directly addresses my situation. I have a conflict in submodules, and I just want to go with their version which I understand i
Is there a git hook I can use for merge conflicts? After a failed git merge, it would be great to be able to write a script that opens all files with conflicts in $EDITOR. Unfortunately the post-merge
According to the manual, git dcommit “will create a revision in SVN for each commit in git.” But is there a way to avoid multiple Subversion revisions? That is, to have git merge all changes prior to
I am using keyword expansion like the one described in the book Pro Git. However, after a commit one needs to do, for example, rm file git checkout file to have the correct keyword expansion in the w
I accidentally did a git rm filename.txt -f now if I do a git commit -m '', it will commit this delete. How do I un-remove it before I do a git commit?
At my company we have a CI/Build server that we use to test and build releases (as well as features and the develop branch). In the git flow branching model when it is time to release you branch off d
I am very new to GIT and I use GIT extensions. Whenever, I pull, GIT auto merges using KDiff3 and only requests help when it sees conflicts. However, I am not very satisfied with the auto merge featur
I want to look at the commit by id. for instance I want to know the code that got committed for that Id something like : git log <commit_id> and this will display the commit code and message t
Is it possible to get info about how much space is wasted by changes in every commit — so I can find commits which added big files or a lot of files. This is all to try to reduce git repo size (rebasi