How can I convert a long series of git merges into a single rebase without merge conflicts?
So I have a branch of master, let's call it foo, that I've been using for a while, and after about 50 commits or so I was getting a rather complicated merge history, as foo had some subbranches of its own. The history was not important to me here, so I decided to clean things up by rebasing each branch and squashing all the commits down to one, so that I'd have just one commit representing the difference between master and that branch.
At first I thought I could just do:
git checkout foo
git rebase master
but this didn't work out for me. The branch had over 50 commits, each touching many files, and each commit was getting a bunch of conflicts.
Instead, what I ended up doing was this:
git checkout foo
<copy all files to another folder>
git checkout master
git branch -D foo
git checkout -b foo
<overwrite all files with the copy I made earlier, and create a new commit>
This served my needs of turning the long history of merges into a single squashed rebase without dealing with all the conflicts along the way, but I'm just wondering if there was a more "git-friendly" way of doing this?
My git repository has ~2,000 commits. For educational purposes, I have been playing around with git rebase -i. When I type git rebase -i first-commit (where first-commit is a tag for the initial comm
let's say if I have 2 branches top and master if I am on feature branch, and run git rebase master does it rebase master or rebase topic branch? doing git rebase --help gave me this Assume the followi
When is it recommended to use git rebase vs. git merge? Do I still need to merge after a successful rebase?
Here's an example: >git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory clean) >git checkout -b test-branch >vi test.c >git add test.c >git commit -m modified test.c &g
I was reading this article http://supercollider.github.io/development/git-cheat-sheet.html, which proposed the following workflow: git checkout master git pull --rebase # update local from remote git
I just finished resolving some conflicts due to a pull from the remote repository of my project. I know that once conflicts have been resolved you have, to my knowledge, 2 solutions : git rebase --co
I'm trying to figure out why rebase requires a three-way merge. For instance, if we have A1 - A2 \ B1 And I've checked out B1, and I want to perform: git rebase A2 why does git merge A2, B1 AND A1
I have the following situation created a branch 'dev' worked on 'dev' worked on 'master' At some point I want to merge my work from 'dev' into master $> git checkout master $> git merge dev T
If I've got a file whose history is like this: ----A----B \ \ C----D----E and I do a blame from E then I'd like to see what changed in revisions B & C, but I don't really care about D, since that
With Git I am on a branch. I am rebasing the branch atop master. There is a conflict that I want to resolve by ignoring the branches version and accepting master's version. How do I indicate I want to
When Mercurial is running under cygwin, it's a bit tricky to figure out how to spawn WinMerge to resolve merge conflicts. How can I do this?
I have used rebase to merge a dev branch into the master which works fine. Now the master contains everything from the dev branch which is what I want. However, now I need to push it to github which
I'm thinking of transforming my merge only workflow to using rebase more often. In this particular case, I'm the only developer, but I work on multiple platforms, often editing same files for platform
I'm using so many git-svn repositories (at the same time) that it's becoming a chore to update them all. I'd like to write a script that automates this, so I can just run it every morning while I fetc
I've just sync'd my git repo and ran into a regression. I'd like to just step through the history until I find the commit to blame, but there's been a huge merge which just shows up as a single commit
I did a series of dumb steps with my local copy of our shared repository, and I'm looking for a way how to fix it. The steps are: I used bookmarks to have multiple heads of a development branch, that
I'm using git svn to work with a client who has an svn repository (our stuff is in github). So I follow the instructions and do a git svn rebase and then git svn dcommit That worked the very first tim
I am not certain I can trust Git to merge automatically. Here is a scenario. Create a program in the master: MOVE 0 TO I. A. PERFORM X-PROC. IF I IS EQUAL TO 25 THEN GO TO A. Developer 1 makes a bra
When I do a pull in git and have to do manual conflict resolution, I then do a rebase and I end up having to resolve the same conflicts again. I want to figure out a process where I only have to resol
What does happen if i do a git merge from another branch, some conflicts happen, the merge does not get commited, and then i do git reset --hard HEAD can i do the merge again? or will git believe tha
I have an irregular time series that I'm working with that I'd like to convert to a regular one, but rather than the usual data missing behavior answered in other questions, I need to have the obser
I have one value 100023 and I have taken it in NSString. Now I want to pass this value in my web service which contains long parameter type so how can I convert string value to long.
On OSX, often I go to the git log in order to find a commit, usually a few back, copy it with my mouse, then rebase off of that. How can I do this easily without using my mouse or memorizing it?
I use git svn to track a SVN repo. When I try to do a git svn rebase I am getting this error: Incomplete data: Delta source ended unexpectedly This is a large repo, with a long history. Just fetching
GIT p4merge - 2 or more conflict in same file I have integrated p4merge with GIT and i came across this situation once. I have a file with merge conflicts. The file say foo.c has merge conflicts in 3
Having an issue with git rebase conflict, but only when using 2 remote repos. Here's the workflow: Do work... Commit pull -r staging master This works fine. If there is a conflict I can resolve it.
There is lots of talk about how it's not easy to undo a merge in git. Short version: if you undo a merge commit, it also tells git to never merge those changes back in in the future. Is there someth
At my company we are using git flow to manage the development of a number of sites. All of these sites are forks of a base repo. It is easy enough to update the sites with updates from the upstream pr
Context We use several git repositories with the same workflow, involving two branches, and are wondering how best to synchronize commits from one to the other. Put simply, our git repositories cont
I wanted to reword a commit in git so I did a git rebase -i 00112233 or something similar and I get merge conflicts without making any changes to the commits that will be applied. I enter the merge co
I usually rebase when I pull in changes from my teammates, and often time I have conflicts: ... CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in app/views/search/index.html.erb Auto-merging public/stylesheets/ap
Below is my hook for commit message it works fine for all merges and commits which is manually done. When I try to use it with rebase it stop saying This branch is only for Merge Commits, cannot com
It was my first try to understanding how git rebase is working. I was on new branch did a lot of changes and then I'd try git rebase, and in result I got next output: $ git rebase master First, rewind
how do I open from terminal window only files with conflicts during git/mercurial merge in textmate/sublime text2 editors
How would I go about creating a bash alias that pipes any conflicting files from a git merge or git rebase into TextMate's mate command?
I read the git book but somehow forgot the rule that says: Do not rebase commits that you have pushed to a public repository. If you follow that guideline, you’ll be fine. If you don’t, people will h
I'm trying to understand ... What's the difference between git merge and git rebase?
I'm trying to rebase 'dev' to catch up to 'master' branch. $ git checkout dev $ git rebase master First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: Corrected compilation problems th
I have had a look at git rebase vs git merge But I'd like to be sure about which solution to choose in this case : I want to implement a new feature on Master so i branch it to a new Feature branch. I
I want to convert long to int. If the value of long > int.MaxValue, I am happy to let it wrap around. What is the best way?
Some complex subversion merges are coming up in my project: big branches that have been apart for a long time. Svn gives too many conflicts - and some of them seem spurious. Given that git is praised
We're using Git 126.96.36.199. Given multiple branches with names BRANCH_1, BRANCH_2, ... BRANCH_N, is there a programmatic/scriptable way to tell what conflicts will exist if we want to merge all of these?
I have tons of data in directory called reports. While doing git merge with another branch I am getting lots of conflicts for files under reports directory. I would like git merge to ignore files unde
My colleague and I are having an vigorous discussion about merge strategies and I'm hoping we can get some information to help resolve it. The tl:dr is: Should we use merge or rebase when pulling chan
Possible Duplicate: Easting northing to latitude longitude I have many Northing/Easting data in a database (for example: n 15217, e 88911) and I need convert it to Lat/long with T-SQL. How I can do
I'm using Git for a long time, but recently faced with the interesting trick that allow you revert the file changes history during merge. Here is the steps to reproduce is: I have the git repository w
At the current point my git-rebase-todo is squash: f732993 aaatest # Rebase f3a7aa7..f732993 onto f3a7aa7 # # Commands: # p, pick = use commit # r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message # e
Is there an option(s) when doing git pull that will not allow any possibility of a merge conflict? I've looked at the merge strategies but none seem to meet this description. I'm looking for an option
I'm very new to git. I have these 2 branches on my remote repository (github) development , master How do I merge development into master on the remote repository? I've tried git merge development and
Why can I not rebase from the same location that I can pull? For example, if I am in a pository I can pull from another repository: git pull /path/to/other But I cannot rebase from that other reposit