git pull with local changes
I have a development clone and a live clone of a git repository, pushing from development and pulling to live. I'm having a problem in that configuration files need to be changed once they get to the live working copy. This was all working fine until I changed the structure of one of my configuration files - when I went to pull it down, there were 2 problems:
- my configuration file wasn't up-to-date, so the changes couldn't be pulled to that particular file (I was expecting that things would just be merged)
- I then tried to git pull again, and saw that everything was up-to-date, when viewing the file showed that it clearly wasn't up-to-date.
There's probably something fundamental I'm not understanding about how git works - is it best to create a live branch for modifying configuration files, then merging after pulling to master, or is there a way around this I'm not seeing?
I often have at least 3 remote branches: master, staging and production. I have 3 local branches that track those remotes. Updating all my local branches is tedious: git fetch --all git rebase origin/
I am working with my friend on a project the code of which is on Git. If I need to pull the changes from my friend's machine, can I pull it from my username/password using the following command withou
I keep running into problems with git in a common workflow on GitHub. I fork a repo I commit some changes I make a pull request to upstream repo Twiddle thumbs while upstream developer sits on my pul
Scenario: Local git repo, default master branch FTP server with content of the repo (non git), synchronized daily with the local repo, master branch Workflow: user1 is working on local git repo (gi
I only have branch master and im getting this error every time i try to git pull: error: Couldn't set refs/remotes/origin/master From /var/lib/git/xxx/project ! a0f80ea..49177a3 master -> origin/
I'm wondering if there's a way to continue to track a particular file on a remote branch, but to have your local machine ignore any local changes you make to it (for example, a configuration file or s
I'm a not a git expert so this might look like a silly question. I have local and remote repositories, I want to sync my local with the remote repository. I have many local changes, stashed changes, a
I just cloned a git repository and checked out a branch. I worked on it, and then decided to remove all my local changes, as I wanted the original copy. In short, I had to do the following two command
I'm developing an iPhone application with another developer. Our git repository is situated on the remote server. So we are working with our working copies and then we do commit, pull, push one by one
I can't git push/pull to github from my corporate vpn: git push origin master ssh: connect to host github.com port 22: Connection timed out fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly I assume this is
On my git, I have a file called b.txt On my local machine, I do not have this file. I tried git pull to retrieve the file from git and place it into the directory of my local machine, but it says: A
After git pull, its output gives a summary on the change amount. If I want to see the detail change of each file or some file, how can I? Update: Thanks. I am not sure why I cannot add comment or vote
I have cloned a git repository(which is in our local server) in my machine. I want to sync the latest changes from remote repository into our local server first and then on to my machine; Because ser
What's the best way in Git to save my local changes into some file format so that others can review it before I make the commit? I know one way to do this is to use git stash save -p and others can vi
I have a git repository that contains other git repositories. Are there commands that recursively push and/or pull for not only the meta-repository but the sub-repositories?
Is it possible to have git pull and git push in one git command? The syntax like git pull & git push doesn't suit me completely, since I need to provide my credentials to the server twice: on pull
Say I have a branch A, and from that I branch B. I make a bunch of changes on A, then checkout B and do a git pull. Now I make a change on B but realize that it should've been in A. If I now try to gi
I changed some files in my repo, but don't want them to be pushed public or create any temporary branch to store them. I just want to save these changes in somewhere. So which command is better: git s
I'm new to git, and it says that one of its features is everything is local, so you commit changes when not online. What happens if you go offline, make several changes, commit etc. And a few minutes
How can I do this in git: My current branch is branch1 and I have made some local changes. However I now realize that I actually meant to be applying these changes to branch2. Is there a way to apply/
This question already has an answer here: What are the differences between 'git pull' and 'git fetch'? 19 answers So - can someone clarify this one: I run: git pull origin master git status A
Using the github webhooks, I would like to be able to pull any changes to a remote development server. At the moment, when in the appropriate directory, git pull gets any changes that need to be made.
I am facing a problem related to Git on Windows, am unable to pull the changes from the repo on git. Am able to add, commit and push my changes, but not pull. Its giving me an error: fatal: C:**\Git/
I'm trying to update my local repo to match the upstream. There are a bunch of conflicts. How do I lose my local changes when updating?
How to un-delete / recover local files from git pull? Scenario: I have local files in a folder I do git init git pull https://.. from server All the local files is deleted Can I get my deleted fil
i just want to update my local files with git. but every time i try to pull i get and error saying that i need to commit certain file first. what is the way to update local file without using commit??
My understanding has always been that git pull is essentially a combination of git fetch and git merge ... but I have encountered it a number of times where pulling, then comparing shows changes that
There are some scripts that do not work correctly if they check for changes. I tried it like this: VN=$(git describe --abbrev=7 HEAD 2>/dev/null) git update-index -q --refresh CHANGED=$(git diff-i
Is there a way to show all commits like a verbose or debug function when using git pull origin master? I just want to see what changes are committed.
How can I safely update (pull) a git project, keeping specific files untouched, even if there's upstream changes? myrepo/config/config.php Is there a way, of, even if this file was being changed on re
The questions I've seen for undoing a git pull a slightly different to mine. This is what I've done: There is a project in directory A (not a repo). I initialized a repository in it, added the files,
Possible Duplicate: “git pull” broken Using git version 188.8.131.52 on my MAC When trying to pull from remote, i am getting the git: 'pull' is not a git command. See 'git --help'. error. This used to w
On a branch I did a few(can't exactly remember how many) git commit and one git pull that resulted in a merge failure. I realized my local changes/commits were just silly, and can be thrown away. To d
I've set up my repository in Git. I can commit to it just fine and dandy. However, when I make changes to my files (git status shows modifications), and I want to pull my repository and overwrite thos
While working on my project's user interface, I test it locally. Thus, I want to be able to uncomment some remote includes in the HTML head, work for a bit, and then push the changes without the uncom
curl can access the URL, but git pull can't. I guess there is something wrong with the URL handling of git if there is user+password+port in the url: foo@workdevel123:~/src/foo$ git pull error: The
I would like to inspect any code changes after doing a git pull. Currently it's just showing me which files changes. How can I see what code changed?
I have a web server that serves a project that is a git repository. When I do some changes to the code I then do a git pull from the server. Sometimes the new code just crashes, I would like to be abl
Is there a way to use git to pull new files and changes that others have made, without having to commit my changes? I'm fearful that my changes might mess things up..
I have 3 files, A, B, C. I made some changes to A and B and then ran git diff to check the changes I made. Everything looked good. Then I made a change to 'C' and ran git diff again but this time it s
I have a repo set up in github to pull into a docker build. I want to add my keys so I can connect to git but I'm unsuccessfully adding the key file. The error: id_rsa: no such file or directory The
I ve just changed PC, i installed git bash as always. And i got some wird problem. When i always was doing some git pull or git clone http:// link/repo.git everything worked fine. Atm i cant pull or c
I created a local copy of a remote repository. Because of some old bad commit data causing trouble, I had to rewrite (filter-branch) the local repo history. So now I have a clone of a remote repo, exc
I'm just wondering what are more reasons to use git pull --rebase instead of git pull except this weird merge commits that appear when you do just git pull? Thanks!
So I had a load of changes and some untracked files. I needed to tweak something, so I used git stash -u, modified a couple of things, committed those changes, pushed them, and then tried to git stash
The problem: I'm getting a merge conflict every time I try to pull into my subtree even when I have no changes. What I'm doing: In subtree-repo # Make some changes $ git commit -am 'Changes made' $ gi
I have created a branch from master, made my changes and am now ready to commit and push back to remote master. Do I first need to commit my changes to my local branch git commit -m new changes, etc.
This error probaby has something to do with my path/environment variables but I don't know enough about those to fix this issue, any help is appreciated. git pull git: 'pull' is not a git command. See
I just squashed some commits with git rebase and did a git push --force (which is evil, I know). Now the other coders have a different history and when they do a git pull, git will merge. Is there any
I searched a lot but was not able to find a confident solution(pardon me as I am new to git and maybe I didn't get some term well). So I will state my exact problem here: I have a software (say in br