Git: rebase merge commit
How i should use rebase for this case:
I have 3 features in branches:
and I have master branch: master I merge this 3 features into master branch.
My commit history looks like:
Merge f3 into master
Merge f2 into master
Merge f1 into master
During testing, I found that my function f2 is not working correctly.
How could I rebase changes (not interactive mode), to my history looks like:
Merge f3 into master
Merge f1 into master
I ran a git pull --rebase, and aborted this after fixing several merge-conflicts using git rebase --abort. Before the attempted rebase, git status told me: Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by
I'm trying to understand why Git automatically does a commit for me when I merge in one scenario, but not in another. Scenario 1: We have just master with many commits and one or more tags. git check
How can I combine 1st commit with 4th commit in git using 'git rebase'. From what I read here http://gitready.com/advanced/2009/02/10/squashing-commits-with-rebase.html, the 'squash' command in 'git r
I am attempting an interactive rebase against my current branch. Ie, I have a commit that fixes a typo, that I'd like to make into a 'fixup' on top of another commit. Sometimes this works. Sometimes t
I always use git commit --verbose. Is there an equivalent option/setting that will make git show me the diff when I'm rewording a commit message during git rebase --interactive?
Suppose my Git repository initially has two branches: Foo and Bar. ... ─ Foo ... ─ Bar I create a third branch, FooBar in which I commit the merge of the two other branches. ... ─ Foo ──┐ FooBar .
Is it possible to change commit messages using git rebase, but without having to re-resolve merge conflicts? I need to bowdlerize an older repo and I don't want to change any of the actual code, just
Is there a way to rebase a single commit from a branch onto another branch? So I have -- -- -- -- -- (Master) \ -- -- -- -- -- XX (Feature-branch) and all I want to do is rebase the last commit of
I have spent the last half hour reading up on merge vs rebase at Stack Overflow. As I understand things, rebase is good because it maintains linearity, but can be confusing for collaborators because i
I recently converted an svn repository with git svn. Unfortunately the svn history has a number of empty commit messages. This is a problem when I rebase and edit/reword a commit before the most recen
Suppose this: mkdir test; cd test echo 1 > file1; git init; git add .; git commit -m initial - file 1 # 1st commit on master echo 2 > file2; git add .; git commit -m file 2 # 2nd commit
I have the following situation: A branch master; A topic branch x off of master; I have made a commit to master, and I would like to have this available in x as well. It is my understanding that I ha
I'm trying to understand why git will produce a commit with a unique SHA1 for a merge between two branches with no conflicts. Is storing the information that there were no conflicts really worth the e
I want to use git rebase to take a sequence of commits and apply them to a different root commit. For example, git rebase --onto root start finish to get the commits from start to finish based on roo
I'm trying to merge a big topic branch into the master, but I want a separate commit that shows how the conflict resolution happened. The goal is to have one commit that shows these files conflicted
is there a best approach for resolving merge conflicts in notes branch(git-notes) of git. The usual practice of doing a git pull --rebase origin refs/notes/commits:refs/notes/commits does not work.
I upload commits from my local Git repo to GitHub regularly, but it was overloaded with commits, and after deciding they are not useful and just spoil the history, I tried using rebase -i to squash so
Some contributors in our project likes to work on master directly and still forget to git pull --rebase. Is there a way to refuse on the server side commit with commit like Merge branch 'master' of .
I am doing a rebase of a big change, with a lot of whitespace changes. In order for the merge to work at all, I need -Xignore-all-space. According to git --help rebase: ignore-space-change, ignore-al
I'm using git-svn; I typically create a topic branch, make commits to it, then checkout master, git svn rebase, git merge --squash topic_branch, git commit -m summary comment, then git svn dcommit.
A GIT merge introduces a new commit. This causes problems with git blame: the merged lines appear to be committed by the developer that did the merge. I can understand this being the case for confli
I have a commit history like: , and I want it to be something like . EDIT: history starts at bottom, on top are newer commits. I'd like to rebase/squash all these commits onto here. Or the one just
I did a git rebase master which involved some manual merging in three files. In one of them, I missed a trailing newline, resulting in the following at the end of the file: <<<<<<<
Is there an option like --author of git-commit for git-merge? We maintain a staging environment where some changes must be performed. Some limitations make us to use only one linux user to access stag
This question already has an answer here: What's the difference between 'git merge' and 'git rebase'? 3 answers Suppose I have the following git tree in the beginning: A -- B -- C -- D I creat
I have read a few others' questions regarding merge VS rebase, what to use and when, but I still have some questions for regular GIT users. Firstly, let me post what I understand to be good GIT practi
I have the following (simplified) scenario in my git repository: A-B-C-F \ D-E Commit F is a fix for C and this needs to become a single commit. I tried an interactive rebase on the main branch usi
I did a 'git fetch' and then a 'git pull --rebase'. It is trying to merge changes from the remote branch to my local branch. And there are some merge conflicts. So I did a 'git reset --hard'. My quest
I was recommeneded to use git pull --rebase in order to avoid the auto merge messages that git adds when pulling changes from a remote repository. When doing so, i see that commits that are being appl
I rebase another branch onto my checkout branch and I get a conflict during rebase. i resolved the merge conflict. $ git status rebase in progress; onto 77c951b You are currently rebasing branch 'test
Our version control manager recommends us to use git pull --rebase to pull new changes from upstream branch. I want to use EGit (Eclipse plugin for git) to execute that. How can I do this?
every time i git rebase my patchset on a new version of the original, do i have to manually resolve the conflicts again and again?
Is there a difference between git rebase upstream/master and git pull --rebase upstream master, and if so, what? The remote could be any remote, not necessarily upstream.
I've been doing some reading on how both the git merge and git rebase operations work, and I think I have a very basic understanding of the differences. I've seen the diagrams :-) Despite that, I'm st
After I merge a feature branch back to main branch I usually need to do a merge commit by default. But I'd like to use the original commit messages from my feature branch in this commit instead of me
I'm trying to rebase a branch B over a branch A, but one of the newest commits in A deletes one folder replacing it with a git submodule. After running git rebase A, git stops at every single commit o
I understand that re-base is good for situations when you want to add a fix to a base branch and put it in all other branches. but it seems much more complicated than a merge(much more conflicts). Am
I managed to create a little mess in my local git repository. I was trying to fix a broken commit by using the following instructions. Before running the git commit --amend (and after the git rebase
Suppose we have the following situation in Git: X---Y feature / A---B---C---D edge Now I rebase the edge branch changing the B commit a little bit (using edit) so it now looks like this: X---Y feat
When writing a commit message, what is the difference between git -m message and git commit -am message Have been listening to a tutorial and the guy did not clearly explain the difference between
I rebased my branch version2 against master using: git rebase --onto master version1 version2 How can I undo this? To undo it I did git reflog Currently, git status (on version2) gives me : Your bran
A---B---C topic / D---G master Say I have the above branch structure in git. If I do git checkout topic followed by git rebase master, from what I've experienced, I will have to resolve conflicts for
I have a git branch from a collaborator that I would like to merge. The problem is that there is a mistake in one of the early commits (for example the commit message must be changed or some EOL chars
Consider the following scenario: - upstream repository with 2500 is stored in SVN - git user A imports the repository into git and commits 1 patch - git user B imports the repository into git and comm
I have a large repository git over 3 years, I want to delete history of changes that were more than a year ago. Is this possible? Can use git rebase but how?
I made some mistakes when merging commits of my colleagues. Now, we have discovered it and we need to apply old commit again, to choose manually the changes in the files. The situation looks like this
I just did a git pull --rebase origin master and there was a conflict. Firstly, this conflict was in a file that I hadnt touched, and was about 10 commits back. Why does this happen? I then accidently
Is there a way to redo a git-svn rebase. or reset any effects by it. In my +8000 commit git-svn repository, something went wrong after merging a branch. My local master does not reflect anything nea
I started using git sometime back and do not fully understand the intricacies. My basic question here is to find out the difference between a git pull and git pull --rebase , since adding the --rebase
I have two git repos, each containing different versions of the same code base. Commits in Repo 1 (most recent last): version 1 version 2 version 3 version 4 version 5 Commits in Repo 2: version 3