Difference between git checkout --track origin/branch and git checkout -b branch origin/branch
Does anybody know the difference between these two commands to clone and track a remote branch?
git checkout -b branch origin/branch
git checkout --track origin/branch
I think both keep track of the remote branch so I can push my changes to the branch on origin, right?
Is there any practical differences??
I wanted to revert all local changes with git checkout -- . but accidently did git checkout - . and it made lots of local modifications that I can't understand at all. What does the second command d
I'm trying to determine the differences that exist among the following 4 commands. Assume that the current branch is master, and the current directory is the working directory, i.e., the one where .
So, currently I am working on merging two branches, A and B. I'm merging into branch B, but I had restructured the project into different directories and would like to do a git checkout A --path/fileT
I am new in git. I could not come back to master branch. I used several git bash command. I am mentioning all those with result below. $ git checkout master error:pathspec 'master' did not match any f
Suppose i have Branch A and then i have master branch. Now i am confused is these two same git checkout master git merge Branch A git push origin master git checkout Branch A git merge master git pus
I am new to Git, I want to know the difference between two commands. `git checkout -b <branch-name>` `git checkout -b <branch-name> origin/master` If I execute the first command, how it c
I need to revert local changes for deployments. (I'd used svn revert for this in old skool SVN days.) And im using git reset --hard HEAD for this. (Also git fetch and git merge origin/$branch --no-ff
It's kind weird, but I can't fulfill a pretty common operation with git. Basically what I want is to checkout a feature branch, not using it's head but using SHA id. This SHA points between merges fro
A Rails 3.2.0 app, working fine with Thin web server, both locally and on Heroku cedar stack. After: $ git branch work $ git checkout work $ rails server I get: => Booting Thin => Rails 3.2.0 a
After reading this article, it makes sense to rebase to gather changes from the main branch on to my feature branch: git workflow and rebase vs merge questions clone the remote repo git checkout -b my
I accidentally tracked workspace configuration files in a git repo. Trying to fix the problem, I git rm --cached those files and added them to .gitignore file. Now every time I checkout a branch from
So I had a changes to a bunch of files, and then created a new branch and pushed them to a new remote branch as follows: git status # lots of changes listed git checkout -b new-branch git add . git co
I really like git. At least, I like the idea of git. Being able to checkout my master project as a separate branch where I can change whatever I want without risk of screwing everything else up is awe
I downloaded last revision only of a big repository, where I need to get a latest revision of one branch so that I can test it. How do I do that? When I did git clone --depth 1 url I got last revision
This question already has an answer here: Merge, update, and pull Git branches without using checkouts 8 answers My remote git repo has two branches 'master' (for the next release) and 'maint'
If you add the following script as a hooks/post-receive hook to a bare git repository foo.git: #!/bin/sh GIT_WORK_TREE=/bar git checkout -f then whenever someone pushes to the repository the current
Is it possible to do the equivalent of git checkout from within Eclipse using the EGit plugin? I have a file that's been modified. I want to discards the changes and revert the file back to what's in
I'd like to create local branch based on other branch. For example I type: git checkout -b feature1 release1.1.3 After that I get: fatal: git checkout: updating paths is incompatible with switching br
I have created a new branch from an existing branch: git checkout master git checkout -b test then in the new branch I've renamed a file: git mv foo.txt fooOld.txt git mv fooNew.txt foo.txt git commi
Creating and using a new branch involves two commands: $ git branch new_branch_name $ git checkout new_branch_name I tend to forget the latter, which can be annoying. Is there a way to do this using
If you try to clone a git repo and checkout a tag in a single command by using the -b or --branch flag for clone: git clone -b v0.8.2 https://github.com/chaoslawful/lua-nginx-module.git You may run i
This question already has an answer here: Checkout remote Git branch 11 answers I have a remote branch: git branch -a *master remotes/origin/develop Can I checkout to remotes/origin/develop ?
So, I am working on a project with XCode. Happily, I found out that it keeps an Git repository within every project. So, after a mistake on a code, i just used git checkout aux.c to move back from th
If I use: $ git reset --hard HEAD~N or $ git checkout HEAD~N Both of two will use the version of HEAD~N to change working directory and stage area. If there is any different between these two comman
Let's begin with a situation. I stash some changes (5 files) git stash Change some files Commit the changes git commit -m Commit message Get the changes back from stash git stash apply I receive a
I've always thought of git reset and git checkout as the same, in the sense that both bring the project back to a specific commit. However, I feel they can't be exactly the same, as that would be redu
I want to roll my Git branch back to a specific commit. So I run git log and find the commit SHA hash, and run git checkout <myhash>. This usually works just fine, but this time something was f
Shell output: Wener@Wener-PC /web/learn/angular/learn/angularjs-book $ git branch --l * forAnyOption forRawgithub master myMatser Wener@Wener-PC /web/learn/angular/learn/angularjs-book $ git co master
Remotes: origin $ git branch * master $ git checkout -b new_feature Now I do couple of commits on new_feature branch and want to push it to origin after updating it. $ git branch master * new _fe
I want to switch to the remote branch in Git. What is the difference these commands? git checkout -b feature1 origin/feature1 and git checkout --track origin/feature1
Abstract: To reproduce the error create a branch and check it out let someone else delete it and create a new branch with the same name now do git branch -D <branch> and git checkout -b <bra
This is strange. I'm trying to make a script that will checkout every local branch and rebase origin/master onto it. So this is my script: for br in `git branch -l`; do git checkout $br git rebase or
I have the following understanding of the git add file and git checkout -- file (but I am not sure if it is correct). Whenever we edit files with a text editor, we do it in the working directory. Each
git checkout -b some_branch master Is that equivalent to the statements: git checkout master git branch some_branch git checkout some_branch If not, then what is the difference? And in terms of merg
I am experimenting with branching on git and running into nightmare after nightmare. Anyway, the current issue is that I wanted to merge the master into the branch. I tried git rebase because some s
Can anyone tell me the difference between: git commit -a -m and git commit -am
I did the following: git clone [fork] worked for a few days, creating new files 1 & 2 git add newfile1 git add newfile2 git checkout -b new_branch git checkout master At this point, I expected n
What is the Mercurial equivalent of the command git checkout removedFile? The word removedFile means the removal by the basic-shell rm -command, not by git rm -command.
As an example: In the kernel source code, it has a lot of tags. I can diff them, such as: git diff v2.6.37-rc3 v2.6.38-rc4 and I get the right output. Now I copy .git directory to another place, and
This question already has an answer here: What's the difference between 'git merge' and 'git rebase'? 3 answers Suppose I have the following git tree in the beginning: A -- B -- C -- D I creat
I had this structure in Git develop C - D - E / master A - B Then, I added a new branch from develop with: git checkout -b new_branch develop This is what i got new_branch C - D - E - F - G / devel
Git diff seems to return different changes when comparing: git diff origin/master ... origin/branch git diff origin/master...origin/branch What's the difference between the two? For those that can't
Given repo Foo and repo Bar. I want to merge Bar with Foo, but only into a separate branch, called baz. git checkout -b baz <= put the Bar repo here.
Obviously bzr clone, bzr branch and bzr checkout all do the same thing when given an URL as parameter and executed in a non-bzr directory. Is there any difference for later Bazaar workflow? i.e. bzr c
I've cloned a repository called A and created a new branch called Li. Now someone updated A's master branch and I've pulled the changes to my master branch using: git checkout master git pull origin m
Normally when you: git checkout foo Modify a file git checkout bar Git will tell you that you can't change branches because you have un-committed modifications. (I don't have the exact message in fr
We're using GitHub here. I have a friend who branched our master branch, and I want to checkout his branch, make a few mods, then put them into his branch. My thought is to grab his branch using git c
I did checkout a file with my latest changes to HEAD by mistake.. git checkout HEAD foo.c that means i lost all my changes that i wanted to commit... is there a way to find these changes in git cach
I sometimes use the checkout -b option to create a new branch, check it out at the same time and set up tracking in one command. In a new environment, I get this error: $ git checkout -b test --track
For example, if I am branch A, and created new branch B with the command git checkout -b B is there any way that sometimes later I can find out where branch B copied from?? (A) in this case