What happens when I do git pull origin master in the develop branch?
Let's say I have a private topic branch called develop with 2 commits ahead of master.
git pull origin master do?
Pull everything from the remote master in the local develop and merge it? Pull everything in the local master branch and merge it?
And is there a way to update master from develop without
git checkout master first?
I want to add these lines to git config. I need a command line solution. [branch master] remote = origin merge = refs/heads/master
I have a local branch master tracking a remote branch origin/master. When I checkout master like this: git checkout refs/heads/master I end up with a detached HEAD: Note: checking out 'refs/head
I've cloned a repository called A and created a new branch called Li. Now someone updated A's master branch and I've pulled the changes to my master branch using: git checkout master git pull origin m
Sometimes I'm getting message that some branch is ahead of origin by # commits. Actually, I did not create those commits and they are pulled from origin. $> git pull origin develop Enter passphrase
how do I fetch a remote branch and update git's local ref for that branch without effecting the current branch? For example if I do this $ git pull origin master origin/master is merged into my curre
What is the difference between git pull origin master and git pull origin/master ?
~/www> git branch --track live origin/master fatal: Not a valid object name: 'origin/master'. ~/www> git remote origin ~/www> git branch * master test_branch working_branch I also tried crea
With unlimited lifetimes for ‘develop’ and ‘master’, what’s the best workflow for merging and tagging a GitHub remote ‘origin/develop’ branch into the remote ‘origin/master’ without the remote ‘master
What is the difference between a space and a slash when running git commands? I sometimes see git push origin master (which is a space) and other times I see git rebase origin/master (which uses a sla
I have an issue when I try to rebase an upstream branch into a topic branch. The workflow is like this: git checkout upstream git pull origin upstream git checkout topic git rebase upstream The resul
I am using a bare git repository on a server for backup, and push local changes there with 'git push' after doing 'git commit' locally. 'git status' tells me # On branch master # Your branch is ahead
I've a master branch with a .gitignore file with directory X listed in it. (X is not being tracked). When I try to add a branch tracking a remote using the command git checkout -b mybranch origin/mybr
As I'm learning about git I keep coming across the terms HEAD, master, origin, and I'm not sure what the differences are. If I understand correctly, HEAD is always equal to the latest revision? (And i
I know, origin is a term for the remote repository and master is the branch there. I am purposely omitting the context here and I am hoping that the answer should not depend upon the context. So in
The following commands seem like a bug to me, but I'm not a git genius so... $ git status # On branch master nothing to commit, working directory clean $ git pull origin master app/controllers/cool_co
I can do a push using gitg and push my code to the remote master branch but I can't see any option to do a git pull. I am on Ubuntu 10 and 11
This question already has an answer here: How to discard local commits in Git? 5 answers I am getting the following when running git status Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 3 commits.
I have a server where I set up a Git repository. From my clients, I can execute git pull origin and git push origin and my changes are correctly pushed/pulled to the remote Git server. I also nee
With a mercurial repository, after initialising it, do I need to commit to the master branch first, before creating another named branch, or can I do: hg init hg branch develop and then commit onto t
I was trying to find out if my branch was up to date with the remote master branch without actually running git pull, and I read elsewhere that git branch -r --no-merged | grep master should tell you
What are the best practices of merging hotfix branch into master/develop? Do I need to merge it into both branches hotfix → master hotfix → develop or merge to master and then to develop after. hotf
A Git scenario: I branch off origin/develop and work on a feature branch called F1. I push F1 and submit a pull request. The pull request is pending. Now I want to create a branch for another featur
the command git branch --set-upstream-to develop origin/develop results in the error fatal: branch 'origin/develop' does not exist I am not sure what this means other than origin develop does not ex
I have the branch master which tracks the remote branch origin/master. I want to rename them to master-old both locally and on the remote. Is that possible? For other users who tracked origin/master (
Possible Duplicate: 'git pull origin mybranch' leaves local mybranch N commits ahead of origin. Why? I'm getting this info in git >git status # On branch master # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/
What does Git exactly do when we add an origin? Is it like saying we are creating a new repository? How different it is from push?
I forked popular project on GitHub that i want to contribute to. Now i made some changes to my master branch and pushed them to my master branch and made a pull request. However my pull request is now
I'd like to push my current branch (hp1) with git push and not git push origin hp1:team/hp1 The remote branch already exists. My local branches: develop master * hp1 git remote show origin tells me
Say I have these git branches: master branchone I want to do this, keeping all history intact: master -> oldmaster branchone -> master
I'm a newbie in using git version control, I got this error when running git pull origin master, this is the error : From /opt/mygit/abc * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD error: Untracked working tree
I forked from a git repo and did some developments. Also the original repo had some progresses. I want to merge it to my repo. I don't want to push anything to original repo. I just want to pull their
I get this error when I try to pull from remote repository using Egit team>pull The current branch is not configured for pull No value for key branch.master.merge found in configuration
I have the three branches one is master develop release-1 There is some template alignment issue which is showing out of format data. I want to know that should i checkout master branch , then edit t
I have problems with git: let's say there was a commit c1 on origin/master 1. I made a branch local-work, committed and pushed the branch to origin. c1 <- origin/master c1 <- c2 <- origin/l
I'm working on a git repository that has a branch off of master, we'll call it the ab branch. My team is working on the ab branch and has a pull-request workflow using github. One of my teammates made
I can say this: git push --all origin and it will push all branches to origin. But if I do this: git pull --all origin then it doesn't pull all the branches from origin, it just returns an error: fa
I want a create git branch like develop/user1/issue1 on remote repository how can I create that? - master => /origin/master - develop => /origin/develop - user1 => /origin/develop/user1 - iss
I'm very new to git. I use git push origin master to push my app, and git pull origin master to pull it down. I do not want to overwrite one single file: db/development.sqlite3, because it has all
After messing up with my git branches a lot, I ended up with a stable develop branch and unstable master. I merged my stable commit of develop branch into master. But still my master is unstable. How
I'm not a git master, but I have been working with it for some time now, with several different projects. In each project, I always git clone [repository] and from that point, can always git pull, so
I'd like to delete a remote branch from my central git repository. The usual advice is to do 'git push origin :branchname' or 'git push origin :heads/branchname'. But when I try that, I get this error
Imagine, I have several branches: master, a, b, c ... Now I'm in master branch and git pull. This fetches all changes from remote server into origin/master, origin/a, origin/b ... branches and merge
Let's say I make a branch off master and make some commits to my branch, commit1, commit2. In the meantime, two other people merge two pull requests to master, hence my branch would be 2 commits behin
I've added this to my .git/config file: fetch = +refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/* Which allows me to pull down pull request diffs, but when I check it out it actually creates a branch with t
I checked out a git project on which I want to work. I don't have push permissions so I will be submitting patches to the upstream maintainers. I want to create my own branch and collaborate with a fe
Using Gerrit it is easy to accidentally merge unstable code from the develop branch into the stable branch: $ git checkout develop $ commit $ git push origin HEAD:refs/for/stable In Gerrit it isn't v
I type in git checkout origin/master at the command line and at first am giving the following prompt: Deletion of directory 'dirname1/dirname2' failed. Should I try again? (y/n) It fails pretty much
Can someone explain why this isn't working? ➜ workspace git:(REL-BRANCH-1.0.1d) ✗ git branch -a REL-BRANCH-1.0.1c * REL-BRANCH-1.0.1d remotes/origin/REL-BRANCH-1.0.1c remotes/origin/master ➜ workspace
My master branch is so different than my development branch that I would like it to just become my master branch without having to do a merge, is this possible? Seems like I could walk into a lot of w
I did a git pull and got an error The following working tree files would be overwritten by merge... Please move or remove them before you can merge. To resolve this I did the following git fetch git